Representative catalog image. Final machine configuration, output and availability are subject to project-specific confirmation.
Beverage filling machine selection and application center
Compare beverage filling machines for still water, juice, tea and carbonated soft drinks, including PET bottle rinsing-filling-capping monoblocks. Allot Tech connects your beverage, bottle, cap and required output to a defined equipment supply proposal. Start with the application, then compare catalog models, operating capacity and quotation scope.
Preliminary selection only. Final machine data will be defined in the technical proposal.
Focused on the filling machine, rinser-filler-capper and machine-level interfaces — not a general complete-line catalog.
Compare catalog machine families
Compare the beverage application first. All capacities below are catalog references on a 500 ml basis, not guaranteed output on every bottle. Configuration and current availability are confirmed in the project proposal.
Normal-pressure rinsing, filling and capping for still drinking water. Compare nine reference models from 6,000 to 42,000 BPH, then specify your bottle, cap and required operating output.
Compare XGF models and specifications
PET juice and tea filling references from 4,000 to 32,000 BPH across eight models. A hot-fill proposal also needs the validated product process, bottle heat resistance and cooling sequence.
Compare RXGF models and process requirements
Isobaric PET bottling references from 4,000 to 28,000 BPH across eight models. Compare the machine together with product temperature, dissolved CO2, pressure supply and foam acceptance.
Compare DXGF models and carbonation requirements01 · Define the application
Missing facts should remain visible instead of being replaced with assumptions.
Still water, juice or tea, carbonated beverage, or another product requiring confirmation.
PET bottle first; bottle size, neck finish, cap and bottle stability matter.
State bottles per hour together with one reference container and realistic operating assumptions.
Ambient, hot-fill, chilled/carbonated, viscosity, particles and hygiene target.
Interactive machine tool
Six-step preliminary check
Describe the product and package first. The result distinguishes gravity, hot-fill, and isobaric routes, then identifies the facts still needed for engineering confirmation.
Preliminary selection result
This is a screening route, not a final equipment specification or performance guarantee.
Catalog equipment evidence
A filler sits between product preparation, container supply and downstream handling. Use these catalog references to define project boundaries before comparing quotations.
Engineering decision guide
Use these pages in sequence to understand, compare, plan, choose and prepare a project-specific request.
Choose a filling route from verified beverage, package, process and output facts before comparing machine proposals.
Compare gravity, hot-fill and isobaric routes against the same product, package, acceptance and cleaning facts.
Define required saleable output by bottle size, product, shift pattern and planned efficiency before comparing nominal machine rates.
Generate a preliminary technology route from beverage, process, package and output inputs, then verify open assumptions with an engineer.
Send a structured machine brief with the known product, package, output, site and project facts, while marking unknowns openly.
48
Use measured or controlled project data. Mark an item as open when it is not yet known instead of guessing.
03 · Select by package
Compare PET, glass and can requirements. A PET monoblock is not automatically a glass-bottle or can-filling solution.
Confirm neck finish, bottle geometry, grip method, cap and heat resistance.
Review packageGlass handling, breakage management and closure application need a dedicated review. Compare the package requirements before requesting a glass-bottle proposal.
Review packageCan filling and seaming require a different container and closure arrangement from a PET monoblock. Define the can, lid, beverage and seam acceptance basis.
Review package04 · Compare filling principles
This table screens the process route; it does not replace product testing or engineering review.
| Filling route | Preliminary fit | Confirm before selection |
|---|---|---|
| Gravity / normal pressure | Still, low-viscosity, non-carbonated beverages | Product properties, fill-level control and hygiene path |
| Hot fill | Heat-processed juice, tea or similar beverages | Fill temperature, hold/cooling sequence, bottle and cap heat resistance |
| Isobaric | Carbonated beverages | Product temperature, CO2 level, pressure balance and foam behavior |
05 · Choose the arrangement
Configuration changes transfer points, access, changeover and interface ownership.
| Configuration | Useful when | Main question |
|---|---|---|
| Separate filler | A defined filling task with clear upstream and downstream interfaces | More interface ownership remains with the buyer or integrator |
| Filler-capper | Close coupling where rinsing is separate or not required | Cap path, transfer and enclosure boundaries must be confirmed |
| 3-in-1 monoblock | Rinsing, filling and capping in one coordinated machine | Compact transfers; change parts, access and cleaning still require review |
| Integrated block | Project-specific wider integration | Scope, controls and service boundaries depend on configuration |
06 · Choose the project path
The replacement path starts with measured interfaces and operating evidence.
Define beverage, package, reference output, utilities, space, downstream scope and FAT basis before comparing offers.
New factory or new lineStart with measured interfaces, performance evidence and the reason for replacement, not with a brochure speed.
Replace an existing machine07 · Define sustainable output
State the speed with a reference bottle and the conditions that make it achievable.
08 · Prepare the RFQ
A useful quotation begins with the same product, package, output and responsibility basis.
09 · Review product contact
CIP support is never assumed across every machine; connections and cleaning responsibilities must be confirmed.
Identify tanks, pipes, valves, filling bowl, nozzles and return paths that contact product.
Confirm manual, assisted or CIP expectations and the parts that must be opened or removed.
Review low points, dead legs, inspection access and change-part handling.
Final material, gasket and surface requirements belong in the technical proposal.
10 · Compare the same scope
No fixed price is presented without a confirmed technical and commercial basis.
11 · Agree acceptance evidence
Define the test materials, duration, output, quality checks and open-item closure before the machine is tested.
Buyer questions
BeverageFillingMachines.com is operated by Allot Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. as a specialized machine selection, equipment supply and project coordination website. Selected manufacturing resources and responsibilities are confirmed in the project proposal.
Still low-viscosity beverages often begin with a gravity or normal-pressure review, heat-processed juice or tea with a hot-fill review, and carbonated beverages with an isobaric review. Product details can change that preliminary route.
12 · Send one clear brief
Share the beverage, package, reference output, project type and the details you already know. Unknowns can remain visible.
Next machine-selection action
Organize the beverage, package, output, filling condition and project type. The result is preliminary and ready for engineering follow-up.
Last reviewed:
